Page 1 of 1
Nature
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2025 9:15 pm
by bluelace
So I was thinking about nature and the world and such, when I came to a puzzling question: "What parts of nature are defined as Frutiger Aero?" On the surface, this may sound like a strange question, because we know nature plays a huge part Frutiger Aero, but I feel as if some aspects of it fit the aesthetic more than others. And now I can't help but wonder if there's some sort of definitive line between Frutiger Aero Nature and NOT Frutiger Aero Nature (I hope that makes sense.) That's all, I just wanted to know what all of you thought about the matter.
Re: Nature
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2025 9:17 pm
by xrossmediabar
grass and water are 100% frutiger aero
Re: Nature
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2025 12:54 am
by Vaking Voda
iirc it's all about tech being safe and clean with nature.
What isn't is those chicken farms where the chickens lay eggs, get fed gunk (presumably), have to live their whole life squished between other chickens, then get butchered.*
Factories/farms with disregard of animals living normal and happy lives are definitely not Frutiger Aero.
*I haven't actually looked into them, I just assume that's how they are, after seeing stock footage of factories full of hens just living in cages a foot wide
Re: Nature
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2025 1:11 pm
by Daniele63
"What parts of nature are defined as Frutiger Aero?" All of it, as long as it has "futuristic" tech involved as well. I'm thinking of the 3D TV ads with fish swimming out of the screen. Nature on it's own can not be considered Frutiger Aero, otherwise the word loses all its meaning. But it's a very important part of it.